It is a Circular Model, so that communication is something circular in nature
Encoder – Who does encoding or Sends the message (message originates)
Decoder – Who receives the message
Interpreter – Person trying to understand (analyses, perceive) or interpret
Note: From the message starting to ending, there is an interpretation goes on. Based on this interpretation only the message is received.
This model breaks the sender and receiver model it seems communication in a practical way. It is not a traditional model.
It can happen within our self or two people; each person acts as both sender and receiver and hence use interpretation. It is simultaneously take place e.g. encoding, interpret and decoding.
Semantic noise is a concept introduced here it occurs when sender and receiver apply different meaning to the same message. It happens mostly because of words and phrases for e.g. Technical Language, So certain words and phrases will cause you to deviate from the actual meaning of the communication.
Note: When semantic noise takes place decoding and interpretation becomes difficult and people get deviated from the actual message.
Advantage of Osgood- Schramm model of communication
- Dynamic model- Shows how a situation can change
- It shows why redundancy is an essential part
- There is no separate sender and receiver, sender and receiver is the same person
- Assume communication to be circular in nature
- Feedback – central feature.
Disadvantage of Osgood- Schramm model of communication
This model does not talk about semantic noise and it assume the moment of encoding and decoding.
What is the conclusion of osgood communication model?
i ‘ve realy got all that i needed ie acccording to wat my teacher asked mi to reseaach abt osgd & schramm.
-thnks-
Excellent
thanks so much but according to the advantages i see Osgood talks of the semantic noise and in the disadvantages it shows that it doesn’t talk about it, isn’t that confusing and the points under merits and demerits are not well explained can u please elaborate, otherwise its great.
Indeed, this model of communication is too practical.
l rilly loved this model in that it shows how a situation can change. thank u
thax for the modle but am confused somewhere becouse you talked about semantic noise in the model and under disadvantages you state that the model excludes semantic noise
Indeed Osgood model of communication starts from the beginning and is endless,since it is dynamic in nature.
Infact the sogood modle of communication is very dynamic.But where is it’s destiny
Infact,this type of modle is wonderfull.Thanx to osgood and schramm
Thanx,the work is so good and i have got what i wanted.
THE MODEL IS VERY INTERESTING
in your opinion, which the best communication model for all situations?
it is really good but does not show the importants of feedback in the communication process and is not really highlighting the key reasons why oral communication is important,,,,, but anyway still good.
i really enjoyed this ,its more practical and more scholarly kep up the standard
thanx i appreciate the good work of osgood and schramm
how about the idea of the medium of the communication model
superb!! u can leave it at dat
Thanx to schramms model
enough said
Am cul at the moment. I av got the essentials of the model. Thanx.
Quite intrestng piece of infoh, bt…”Sum more Examples vl b highly Appriciated”
I have realy liked this model of communication because it seems to be the best.thank you
Nice work people|
Very good
very helpful, i appreciate
critically the model does not sense because effective communication does not depend only into feedback . but also what about channel . so to me am not sartisfield whis these model. ok for your briefy explanation
Thanx for the model but in which context snder to become reciever? Also schramm did not show where feedback start and used message to both . Also model is interesting since it involves human as an active in communication rather than passive one.
Superb!
hellowwwwwwwwwww! Thanx inaf i woz bn xo mbweladiiii about thc model thanx kiongoz
You have just talked about semati noise…. I havent got you yet about the topic.
this model is good model but some problem in model that noise is not abelevil in model
Kassindi Erick.
The model is so constructive and practical. therefore it is bettre to put it into implementation
enough said……
This so good thanks Schramm
good
Amazing….n
It good but I don’t think it enough. What about the channel?
thanks 4 you notes, wat of the explanation separating the two ie. osgoo and schramm. i will totally appreciate your feedback. thanks in advance
Wonderful job Osgood and Schramm
That alot this is great. i am happy to find this.Thanks
The explanation is a perfect one but on sematic noise its a bit confusing
thx so much 4 the model but u ignore the channel and noise
Thanks for the model but you can add the application of the schramm model of communication
that was helpful. thanx
I havent got the concept at all
a like your explanation coz are well understood by majority
Too touching but haven’t seen the sender and the receiver
this is a good model but if u give some examples for explaning it in classroom situation it be excellent.
This model is so demanding in the real higher and tertiary education and is vitally of importance